Abstract

Simple SummaryThe UK imports wild animals for commercial purposes from countries all across the world. We analyse a database of wildlife records from the UK’s Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) to summarise the volume and variety of non-CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) listed wild animal imports over a recent 5-year period (2014–2018). We found that over 48 million individual animals were imported into the UK from 90 countries across nine global regions from 2014–2018. In terms of volume (semi-domesticated pigeons and game birds aside), amphibians were the most commonly imported group (73%), followed by reptiles (17%), mammals (4%), and birds (3%). The highest number of import records came from Europe and Africa, but the largest volume of animals came from North America and Asia. We review the potential for infectious diseases emerging from these vast and varied wildlife imports and discuss the potential threats they pose to public health. We also draw attention to an observed current lack of detail in the APHA database and suggest that better record keeping and reporting could help prevent and manage the introduction of infectious diseases.International wildlife trade is recognised as a major transmission pathway for the movement of pathogenic organisms around the world. The UK is an active consumer of non-native live wild animals and is therefore subject to the risks posed by pathogen pollution from imported wildlife. Here, we characterise a key yet overlooked portion of the UK wildlife import market. We evaluate the trade in live non-CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) wild terrestrial animals entering the UK over a 5-year period using data reported by the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA). Between 2014 and 2018, over 48 million individual animals, across five taxonomic classes and 24 taxonomic orders, were imported into the UK from 90 countries across nine global regions. The largest volumes of wild animals were imported from North America and Asia, and most of the import records were from Europe and Africa. Excluding Columbiformes (pigeons) and Galliformes (‘game birds’), amphibians were the most imported taxonomic class (73%), followed by reptiles (17%), mammals (4%), birds (3%), and arachnids (<1%). The records described herein provide insight into the scope and scale of non-CITES listed wildlife imported in to the UK. We describe the potential for pathogen pollution from these vast and varied wildlife imports and highlight the potential threats they pose to public health. We also draw attention to the lack of detail in the UK wildlife import records, which limits its ability to help prevent and manage introduced infectious diseases. We recommend that improved record keeping and reporting could prove beneficial in this regard.

Highlights

  • Billions of plants, animals, and their products are traded across the globe annually [1], including a marked amount of wildlife trade for commercial purposes

  • Data on the volume of non-CITES listed live wild vertebrates imported into the United Kingdom (UK) between 2014 and 2018 from all other countries was obtained from the UK APHA via a Freedom of Information Act (FOI) request, which was received on 03.09.19 (Ref: ATIC1797)

  • The APHA records show that a total of 1873 individually identified wildlife import records were reported by the UK between January 2014 and December 2018

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals, and their products are traded across the globe annually [1], including a marked amount of wildlife trade for commercial purposes. Wildlife trade can benefit local communities economically by providing local livelihood opportunities and financial incentives to protect wild spaces [3]. Despite these benefits, the increasing trade of wild animals to meet the growing demand from local and global markets has had significant negative impacts. Wildlife trade facilitates the introduction of species to new regions, where they compete with native species for resources, alter ecosystems, damage infrastructure and crops [5], and contribute to biodiversity loss, pathogen emergence, and lowered food security [2]. The extraction of wild animals from their habitats, and their transport through global markets, involves major animal welfare, health, and conservation concerns [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.