Abstract
Transitional Safeguarding is emerging as a new concept in social work and social care, inviting us to reconsider the binary divides of existing adult and child safeguarding systems. These often fail to adequately meet the needs of young people, particularly those experiencing extra-familial risks and harm. Transitional Safeguarding acknowledges the ‘in-between’ position of young people in adolescence, relating both to their physical and psychosocial development but also to their rights to services, participation and wellbeing. As such, transitional safeguarding challenges conventional ideas about how we frame risk and vulnerability, requiring us to reconsider narrow conceptualisations of safeguarding systems and practice. From a psychosocial perspective, the splitting involved in creating binary, ‘either/or’ categories (such as who presents ‘a risk’ and who is ‘at risk’) may be a defensive response to overwhelming anxiety and complexity, a familiar characteristic of social work and social care practice. This conceptual paper is intended to help inform and underpin practice responses and is based on work from the first phase of a four year Economic and Social Research Council funded research project on how innovations in social care systems and practices can improve service experiences and outcomes for young people facing extra-familial risks and harm.
Highlights
‘Mike’ (19) has just been released from prison after severely injuring a 15 year old boy in a fight
‘Leila’ (20) lives in a hostel with her 9 month old baby. She was known to children’s social care services for frequently ‘going missing’ and it was thought that she might be being groomed by older men for sexual exploitation
This article focuses on Transitional Safeguarding and draws on some of the findings from our documentary analysis, conducted in 2020, of key UK policy, guidance and thematic reports on safeguarding young people in the context of extra-familial risks and harms (EFRH)
Summary
Risk, Vulnerability and Complexity: Transitional Safeguarding as a Reframing of Binary Perspectives To cite this article: Nathalie Huegler & Gillian Ruch (2021): Risk, Vulnerability and Complexity: Transitional Safeguarding as a Reframing of Binary Perspectives, Practice, DOI: 10.1080/09503153.2021.1932787 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2021.1932787
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have