Abstract

In the modern era of high-quality cross-sectional imaging, pancreatic cysts (PCs) are a common finding. The prevalence of incidental PCs detected on cross-sectional abdominal imaging (such as CT scan) is 3%–14% which increases with age, up to 8% in those 70 years or older. Although PCs can be precursors of future pancreatic adenocarcinoma, imaging modalities such as CT scan, MRI, or endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) are suboptimal at risk stratifying the malignant potential of individual cysts. An inaccurate diagnosis could potentially overlook premalignant lesions, which can lead to missed lesions, lead to unnecessary surveillance, or cause significant long-term surgical morbidity from unwarranted removal of benign lesions. Although current guidelines recommend an EUS or MRI for surveillance, they lack the sensitivity to risk stratify and guide management decisions. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) with EUS-FNA can be a superior diagnostic modality for PCs with sensitivity and accuracy exceeding 90%. Despite this, a significant challenge to the widespread use of nCLE is the lack of adequate exposure and training among gastroenterologists for the real-time interpretation of images. Better understanding, training, and familiarization with this novel technique and the imaging characteristics can overcome the limitations of nCLE use, improving clinical care of patients with PCs. Here, we aim to review the types of CLE in luminal and nonluminal gastrointestinal disorders with particular attention to the evaluation of PCs. Furthermore, we discuss the adverse events and safety of CLE.

Highlights

  • Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a novel diagnostic technique that utilizes a laser beam to obtain in vivo real-time pictures of the tissues that mimic histological images.[1,2] CLE has been used in diagnosing luminal gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, such as Barrett’s esophagus, colorectal neoplasms, and biliaryAbbreviations used in this paper: Artificial intelligence (AI), artificial intelligence; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CI, confidence interval; CLE, confocal laser endomicroscopy; endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), endoscopic ultrasound; fine needle aspiration (FNA), fine-needle aspiration; GI, gastrointestinal; IPMN, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; MCN, mucinous cystic neoplasm; needle-based probe was developed for CLE (nCLE), needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; PC, pancreatic cyst; PD, pancreatic duct; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; SCA, serous cystadenoma.Most current articleCLE and pancreatic cysts 161cases

  • Abbreviations used in this paper: AI, artificial intelligence; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CI, confidence interval; CLE, confocal laser endomicroscopy; EUS, endoscopic ultrasound; FNA, fine-needle aspiration; GI, gastrointestinal; IPMN, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; MCN, mucinous cystic neoplasm; nCLE, needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; PC, pancreatic cyst; PD, pancreatic duct; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; SCA, serous cystadenoma

  • The overall rate of adverse events reported for EUS-FNA is approximately 5%, and the rate of acute pancreatitis is about 2.0% which is comparable with that of EUS-nCLE

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) ( known as an optical biopsy) is a novel diagnostic technique that utilizes a laser beam to obtain in vivo real-time pictures of the tissues that mimic histological images.[1,2] CLE has been used in diagnosing luminal gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, such as Barrett’s esophagus, colorectal neoplasms, and biliary. Abbreviations used in this paper: AI, artificial intelligence; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CI, confidence interval; CLE, confocal laser endomicroscopy; EUS, endoscopic ultrasound; FNA, fine-needle aspiration; GI, gastrointestinal; IPMN, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; MCN, mucinous cystic neoplasm; nCLE, needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; PC, pancreatic cyst; PD, pancreatic duct; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; SCA, serous cystadenoma. The increasing use of cross-sectional abdominal imaging has frequently resulted in the identification of PC. These imaging modalities have limited accuracy in characterizing PCs and in predicting their malignant potential. We attempt to provide a comprehensive review of the role of CLE in the diagnosis and characterization of PC, associated challenges, and the limitations to its incorporation into routine clinical practice

Literature Search
Study design
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call