Risk of Pacemaker Implantation After Degenerative Mitral and Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Surgery

Abstract

A recent multicenter trial showed a reduction in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) progression when tricuspid annuloplasty was performed at the time of surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR), but with a 14% pacemaker (PPM) rate. We present real-world outcomes at a high-volume center for degenerative MR surgery with/without tricuspid annuloplasty. Patients undergoing first-time degenerative mitral surgery between 2011-2021 were identified (n=1,738). After excluding patients undergoing aortic, aortic valve, or tricuspid replacement procedures, patients were stratified into mitral surgery alone (n=1,068) versus mitral surgery plus tricuspid annuloplasty (n=417). Outcomes including operative mortality, new PPM implantation, and postoperative length of stay as well as risk-adjusted overall mortality were compared. Among 1,485 patients in this study, 98% underwent mitral repair. Compared to concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty patients, those undergoing mitral surgery alone were 6 years younger and had lower median STS PROM. Among concomitant tricuspid repair patients, 85% (355/417) had moderate or less preoperative TR, while 15% (61/417) had severe TR. Operative mortality was 1.4%. The incidence of new PPM implantation was 0.7% (7/1,068) in the mitral only group and 5.5% (23/417) in the concomitant tricuspid group (p<0.001). Although unadjusted cumulative survival was lower in the concomitant tricuspid group, after risk adjustment, concomitant tricuspid surgery was not associated with worse overall mortality (HR 0.80 [95% CI, 0.53-1.19], p=0.27). Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty is safe, with no difference in mortality and a less than 6% PPM rate at a high-volume mitral center. These data provide real-world context for concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty.