Abstract
Relative risks were calculated to assess the potency of different factors associated with the two extremes of the birthweight distribution. Maternal height affected the chances of having a small-for-dates (SFD) or large-for-dates (LFD) baby to an equal and opposite extent; but the risks associated with maternal weight were greater for LFD than SFD infants. Smoking increased the SFD risk by 3.5 times, whereas the LFD risk was only reduced by a half. Pre-eclampsia was associated with a very high SFD risk (14.6); in the LFD group it was insignificantly raised. The LFD relative risk steadily rose with increasing parity, but in the SFD group it fluctuated around unity. Among multiparae the risks of an SFD or LFD infant when previous siblings had been of relatively low or high birthweight for gestational age, respectively, were much increased. Estimates of attributable risk showed that if pathological factors such as smoking, hypertensive disorders and congenital abnormalities could be completely eliminated the number of SFD babies in this population would be reduced by about 60%; conversely the number of LFD babies would be increased by about 30%.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call