Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of contemporary secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and the differences between six ethnic groups in a large, observational cohort.DesignWe included participants with a self-reported history of CVD from the HEalthy LIfe in an Urban Setting (HELIUS) study, which investigates inequalities in health between six ethnic groups living in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. We quantified the proportions of patients who were at the preventive treatment goal according to the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology for six risk factors: hypertension, dyslipidaemia, smoking, overweight, physical inactivity and diabetes mellitus, and the use preventive medication.ResultsOf 22,165 participants, 1163 (5%) reported a history of CVD. Mean age was 54 years. Overall, 69% had a systolic blood pressure of <140 mm Hg, and 42% had a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol of <2.5 mmol/l. Non-smoking was found in 67%. Body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2 was found in 24%, and 54% reported adequate physical activity. The mean number of risk factors per patient was three (±1.1) out of six, and only 2% had all risk factors on target. Across the ethnic groups, non-smoking was more prevalent in the Ghanaian and Moroccan groups than in the Dutch (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively); BMI <25 kg/m2 and adequate physical activity were less prevalent among all ethnic minority groups compared with the Dutch group.ConclusionWe found large treatment gaps in secondary prevention of CVD. Ethnic differences in risk factors were found; however, strategies to improve overall risk factor management may be mandated before designing ethnic-specific strategies.

Highlights

  • Individuals with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) have a high risk of mortality and recurrent morbidity [1,2,3]

  • The proportion of Dutch with intermediate or higher education was significantly greater compared with all the other ethnic groups (61% vs. ~28%, p < 0.001)

  • In our study, performed in individuals with a history of CVD in a large contemporary population-based cohort, we found that the proportion of risk factors on target for secondary prevention were disappointing, both for the total group and when stratified by ethnicity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Individuals with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) have a high risk of mortality and recurrent morbidity [1,2,3]. Secondary prevention of CVD is effective in decreasing this risk, and has been shown to reduce healthcare costs, increase economic productivity and improve quality of life [4, 5]. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline on CVD prevention provides clear goals for primary and secondary CVD prevention [6]. The recent EUROASPIRE IV survey (2012–2013) found that the majority of 7998 patients with established CVD (hospital arm) do not achieve the lifestyles, risk factor levels, and therapeutic goals recommended in the 2012 ESC guideline [7]. The EUROASPIRE surveyed recruited patients from selected hospitals, and the findings on secondary prevention may differ in a population that includes more ethnic minority groups

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call