Abstract
BackgroundIn outpatient forensic psychiatry, assessment of re-offending risk and treatment needs by case managers may be hampered by an incomplete view of client functioning. The client’s appreciation of his own problem behaviour is not systematically used for these purposes. The current study tests whether using a new client self-appraisal risk assessment instrument, based on the Short Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START), improves the assessment of re-offending risk and can support shared decision making in care planning.MethodsIn a sample of 201 outpatient forensic psychiatric clients, feasibility of client risk assessment, concordance with clinician assessment, and predictive validity of both assessments for violent or criminal behaviour were studied.ResultsAlmost all clients (98 %) were able to fill in the instrument. Agreement between client and case manager on the key risk and protective factors of the client was poor (mean kappa for selection as key factor was 0.15 and 0.09, respectively, and mean correlation on scoring −0.18 and 0.20). The optimal prediction model for violent or criminal behaviour consisted of the case manager’s structured professional risk estimate for violence in combination with the client’s self-appraisal on key risk and protective factors (AUC = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.60–0.80).ConclusionsIn outpatient forensic psychiatry, self-assessment of risk by the client is feasible and improves the prediction of re-offending. Clients and their case managers differ in their appraisal of key risk and protective factors. These differences should be addressed in shared care planning. The new Client Self-Appraisal based on START (CSA) risk assessment instrument can be a useful tool to facilitate such shared care planning in forensic psychiatry.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0500-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
In outpatient forensic psychiatry, assessment of re-offending risk and treatment needs by case managers may be hampered by an incomplete view of client functioning
The current study aims to investigate the feasibility of administering our new ‘Client Self-Appraisal based on Short Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START)’ instrument, the concordance between client and clinician risk assessments, and the predictive validity of both assessments for incidents of violent or criminal behaviour
This study demonstrates that the Client Self-Appraisal based on START can be administered in routine outpatient forensic psychiatric care
Summary
In outpatient forensic psychiatry, assessment of re-offending risk and treatment needs by case managers may be hampered by an incomplete view of client functioning. Shared Decision Making (SDM) has been suggested as an intermediate approach between the paternalistic attitude of the medical and RNR models and the ‘client decides’ approach conveyed by the GLM model [6]. Of special interest for forensic psychiatry is SDM’s explicit aim to get clients more involved in their treatment [13, 14]. It has been noted, that offering clients some degree of autonomous choice in their treatment planning may be challenging in situations where that treatment is involuntary [8, 15, 16]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have