Abstract

Historically, people lived in harmony with watercourses, cultivating their land and creating their habitat according to the benefits and the whims of the rivers. Since the beginning of the 20th century, man has domesticated his environment with determination. The rural exodus, the agricultural depreciation and the numerous river amenities have resulted in a momentum of area closures and in the modification of hydraulic conditions during the flow of flood waters. An unmanaged vegetation colonization along the edge of watercourses (protection dikes, retention dams, appointed river banks) induces various issues; however, a drastic management is not absolutely beneficial and sometimes even runs counter to the objective. The environmental issues conciliation – positive impact on fluvial ecosystems (shade, water decontamination, bank stabilization, biodiversity) – with anthropogenic issues is therefore essential to identify these suitable management solutions. Since 1970 and until 2006, phytopharmaceutical products were used extensively to control vegetation development on dikes, dams and canals due to their high-speed action and their low-cost implementation. Phytopharmaceutical product prohibition induces a great expansion of vegetation on structure cladding. Pioneer trees species like poplar are largely represented. Implanted near water points they grow fast in phytopharmaceutical treatment prohibited zone. Woody vegetation control methods are frequently implemented too late, when impacts caused by roots are observed; structural reparation costs are consequently very high. New vegetation management solutions have to be developed, in order to allow both risk reduction and environmental preservation. Some different eco-friendly solutions exist but must be promoted by rivers and dikes managers. This paper presents these integrated solutions and illustrates through some case studies the implemented solutions to reconcile the antagonist environmental and anthropogenic issues.

Highlights

  • With the decrease of the exploitation of firewood, overgrowth of vegetation on hydraulic structures has merged with the existing riparian areas

  • Certain populations have lost the culture of risk by feeling completely safe from floods at the back of the structures

  • The role of structures is to ensure the safety of people and property, many canals and dikes covered with vegetation render them almost useless

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the decrease of the exploitation of firewood, overgrowth of vegetation on hydraulic structures has merged with the existing riparian areas. Civil engineering has made significant progress in the field of hydraulic structures and has resulted in the massive construction of dikes and dams. Hydraulic structures can take many forms, such as floodprotection dikes, canal embankments or dams. The maintenance of these structures requires certain safety principles to be respected, especially towards the excessive and sometimes harmful development of the vegetation on the structure. The role of structures is to ensure the safety of people and property, many canals and dikes covered with vegetation render them almost useless

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call