Right ventricular global strain in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with and without right ventricular hypertrophy

Abstract

PurposeRegardless of whether there are morphological abnormalities of right ventricle in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients, the exact contribution of right ventricular (RV) global strains remains unresolved. We aimed to study the prognostic value of RV global strains in HCM patients with and without RV hypertrophy (RVH). MethodA total of 358 HCM patients who underwent the CMR examination and carried out the follow-up were finally included in this retrospective study. The endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, aborted SCD, and heart failure readmission. RV hypertrophy (RVH) was defined as maximal RVWT ≥ 5 mm at end-diastole. RV global strains (RV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and RV global circumferential strain (GCS) were measured in HCM patients by cardiac MRI feature tracking technique. The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility were evaluated. Receiver-operating characteristic curves and Kaplan–Meier curves, cox proportional hazards regression, Likelihood ratio test and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) analysis were performed. P-value were corrected for multiple testing when using many covariables by a false discovery rate adjustment. ResultsOver a median follow-up of 25 (range 3–54) months, 49 patients reached the composite endpoints. HCM patients were divided into the RVH group and non-RVH groups. In the multivariate cox proportional hazards regression, after adjusting multiple clinical and imaging variables, RV GLS and RV GCS were independently associated with the composite endpoints in the RVH group (HR: 1.123; 95 % CI: 1.048–1.205; P = 0.002) and non-RVH group (HR: 1.174; 95 % CI: 1.031–1.337; P = 0.015), respectively. And The IDI index of models improved when adding RV GLS (IDI = 0.030, p < 0.001) and RV GLS (IDI = 0.056, p = 0.020), respectively. ConclusionsRV GLS and RV GCS are independent predictors of HCM with RVH and without RVH, respectively. RV GLS in the RVH group and RV GCS in the non-RVH group provide additional values for predicting the risk of adverse events.