Abstract

The purpose of this publication is to bring the constitutional right to court, the concept of resolution as a response to crises in financial systems and the existence of a right to court in national legislation on the Bank Guarantee Fund, deposit guarantee scheme and forced restructuring. The article questions the correctness of the implementation of Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014. establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/ EEC and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, which consequently deprives entities under national law of a number of powers under the rules of procedure before the administrative resolution authority and an administrative court. As a result, there is a violation of the right to a fair and public hearing of a case resulting from an administrative decision under the Act of 10 June 2016 on the Bank Guarantee Fund, Deposit Guarantee Scheme and Forced Restructuring, without undue delay by a competent, independent, impartial and independent court

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call