Abstract

A comparison is made between two methods of systematic sampling, using the resident populations of Mont Pilat Regional Park, France, as an example. Although mostly covered by an evergreen forest, the study area was made of a mosaic of different habitats. 212 “ census spots” (points d’écoute) were first selected at random on a rectangular grid whose lines were 1.6 km apart. Identification (by sound) of resident birds was made during 20 minutes, once during the breeding season on each “ census spot”. 84 species of resident birds were identified in this way. These results are compared with those obtained by a simpler technique, where a smaller number of “census spots” (23 and 24) were selected at random on a wider grid (5 X 5.6 km) laid in the same study area. The duration of the single census period was also limited to 10 minutes in this instance. Such a simplified technique enabled a smaller number of species to be identified (56 and 52 respectively). 150 “census spots”, each of a 20 minutes duration, are shown to be able to detect 95 % of the resident bird species in such a mosaic of habitats.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.