Abstract

This commentary on Reisman's article on Richard Titmuss argues that, although Titmuss's work was associated with the creation and development of the welfare state in the mid-20th century, the framework of ideas that informed his analysis remains relevant to the political debates about welfare policy in the early 21st century. This is particularly true of his views about the balance between the state and the market in securing welfare and wellbeing.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.