Abstract

Yield losses from insect pests were determined by the insecticide check method in 60 crops in the Philippines from 1976–1986 in three rice environments with traditional and modern cultivars in 10 sites. Plot size of 100 m2 minimized interplot interference from insecticide protection on untreated plots. Low and high crop losses were recorded across sites in drylands (2-39%, -X = 25%), rainfed wetlands (13-24%, -X = 21%), and irrigated wetlands (5-40%, -X = 18%). Weighted crop loss for the Philippines based on production by environment and cultivar type averaged 18.3% or 0.57 t/ha per crop. Consistently greater yield loss occurred in the vegetative (50%) than reproductive (30%) or ripening (20%) stages across environments and cultivars. No epidemics affected the trials therefore crop losses were those from chronic pests. The major chronic pests in the wetlands were stem borers, leaffolders, whorl maggot, and rice bug; and in the drylands were ants, seedling maggots, white grubs, leaffolders, stem borers and rice bug. Yield loss variability was greater between fields than crops or sites, therefore a control strategy based on corrective actions when pest numbers reach threshold levels is more efficient than prophylactic actions. Yield loss was more in early maturing cultivars stressing the importance of compensation in tolerating insect damage. Insect stresses perhaps can be compensated by total crop management to increase the plant’s ability to tolerate insect damage.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.