Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Cholestasis may increase the difficulty of diagnosing Wilson’s disease (WD). We aimed to compare Leipzig score including hepatic parenchymal copper concentration or rhodanine stain, to diagnose hepatic WD, in noncholestatic patients with fibrosis. Materials and Methods: We defined cholestasis by biochemical and/or histological criteria. Of noncholestatic patients who had liver fibrosis and liver copper estimation, those with isolated hepatic WD comprised WD study group and those with liver disease other than WD, with either low serum ceruloplasmin, high urinary copper, or Kayser–Fleischer ring, were controls. WD diagnosis by Leipzig score was labeled highly likely, probable, or unlikely. Results: Twenty WD study group patients (12 males; 21 [6–52] years; median [range]) and 18 controls (13 males; 32 [10–69] years, all had high urinary copper) were recruited. Rhodanine stain was positive in 60% WD patients and in 33% of controls. With rhodanine stain, Leipzig score had sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval: 83.2%–100%), specificity of 66.7% (41%–86.7%), and positive likelihood ratio of 3 (1.56–5.77) to diagnose probable/highly likely WD. In contrast, on adding hepatic parenchymal copper concentration, Leipzig score had sensitivity of 100% (83.2%–100%), but specificity was 38.9% (17.3%–64.2%). In controls, Leipzig score (including rhodanine stain) of ≤ 2 ruled out WD. Conclusion: On excluding cholestatic patients, rhodanine stain performs better than hepatic parenchymal copper concentration to diagnose hepatic WD using Leipzig score in patients with fibrosis. Widespread availability is an added advantage of rhodanine stain.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.