Abstract
The same three solutions used in Part I were used to measure stress relaxation after the cessation of steady simple shear flow and stress growth after the onset of steady simple shear flow. Both shear and normal stress difference responses were measured. In addition, “interrupted flow,” a turret-shaped function for the velocity gradient, was studied. The data are used to evaluate the three rheological models considered in Part I. These models all make the same predictions for stress relaxation. They differ markedly in their predictions for stress growth; the OWFS model predicts no overshoot, the WJFLMB model predicts a single overshoot, and the Spriggs 4-constant model predicts oscillatory behavior. The models satisfactorily describe the stress relaxation data but fail to describe the stress growth data.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.