Abstract

Solid-state fermentation has a special advantage of preventing the foaming problem that obstructs submerged fermentation processes for rhamnolipid production. In the present work, a 50:50 mixture of sugarcane bagasse and sunflower seed meal was selected as the optimum substrate for rhamnolipid production using a Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant 15GR and an impregnating solution including 5% v/v glycerol. Using Box–Behnken design, the optimum fermentation conditions were found to be an inoculum size 1% v/v, temperature 30 °C and unlike other studies, pH 8. These optimized conditions yielded a 67% enhancement of rhamnolipid levels reaching 46.85 g rhamnolipids per liter of impregnating solution, after 10 days, which was about 5.5 folds higher than that obtained by submerged liquid fermentation. Although maximum rhamnolipids concentration was obtained after 10 days of incubation, rhamnolipids concentration already reached high levels (41.87 g/l) after only 6 days. This rhamnolipid level was obtained in a shorter time and using lower carbon source concentrations than most studies reported so far. The findings obtained indicate an enormous potential for employing solid-state fermentation for rhamnolipid production by the studied isolate.

Highlights

  • Rhamnolipids (RLs) are promising biosurfactants mainly used for environmental applications because of their impressive emulsifying and surface active properties

  • Different factors affecting RL production by P. aeruginosa 15GR using solid-state fermentation (SSF) Time course of RL production in SSF using the selected substrate and in submerged liquid fermentation (SLF) Figure 2 showed the profile of RL production in both SLF and SSF

  • Using SLF, maximum RL production by P. aeruginosa 15GR was obtained at day 6, reaching 8.45 g/l only (Fig. 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rhamnolipids (RLs) are promising biosurfactants mainly used for environmental applications because of their impressive emulsifying and surface active properties Their use is limited because of their elevated costs relative to that of chemical surfactants (Noh et al 2014). The potential of SSF is to offer the microbes an environment very similar to the natural environment where they normally live This is probably the main reason why higher product concentrations are obtained using SSF in comparison to SLF (Thomas et al 2013). The use of these low cost residues makes the bioprocess economically attractive These environmental benefits have shifted the industrial manufacturing towards SSF due to the increased demand for ecofriendly processes rather than chemical processes

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call