Abstract

Nature of Science (NOS) is an area of research in science education that has gained significant attention for several decades. It is a subject that has infiltrated curriculum policy documents, such as the new Next Generation Science Standards in the United States, being promoted in teaching and learning of science at the level of the classroom. Yet the precise definition of NOS is a contested territory. For example, the relationship between NOS and scientific inquiry is not agreed upon. In the last few years, the debate around what counts as NOS has been escalating. The presentation will outline some of the recent debates in the science education research community on NOS and argue that the contemporary accounts are limited in their depictions of science. In particular, it will be argued that the so-called consensus NOS accounts tend to be fragmented and not inclusive of science in its broader sense and context. I will illustrate how, for instance, the notion of “scientific practices” can be used to build up a holistic account of science such that students are equipped with a broad range of understandings and skills about NOS. Based on a theoretical interdisciplinary account, we have developed a model that can be applied in teacher education as well as science teaching and learning. The model infuses the relationships between the various epistemic, cognitive and social features of science: (a) epistemic components, such as scientific activities (such classification, experimentation and observation), data, model, explanation, prediction; (b) cognitive components, such as representations, and reasoning; and (c) social components, such as discourse and social certification of scientific claims. An empirical study funded by TUBITAK-Marie Curie Co-Funded Brain Circulation Fellowship will be described to exemplify how a holistic account of scientific practices was promoted in pre-service science teachers’ learning and what the impact was on teachers’ perceptions of NOS. Some recommendations and implications for science education will be discussed particularly in relation to about how science teacher education programmes can infuse more coherent and holistic accounts of NOS.

Highlights

  • Nature of science (NOS) is a significant area of research in science education and has a history dating back to at least the 1960s (e.g. Abd-El-Khalick, Bell, & Lederman, 1998; Allchin, 2013; McComas, Clough, & Almazroa,1998; McComas, & Olson, 1998)

  • The sample studies presented in this paper illustrate that even in a short span of an intervention, preservice science teachers were able to integrate aspects of scientific practices into their thinking

  • There was a particular difference in their thinking about scientific practices in a holistic sense

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nature of science (NOS) is a significant area of research in science education and has a history dating back to at least the 1960s (e.g. Abd-El-Khalick, Bell, & Lederman, 1998; Allchin, 2013; McComas, Clough, & Almazroa,1998; McComas, & Olson, 1998). (1) Tentativeness of Scientific Knowledge: Scientific knowledge is both tentative and durable; (2) Observations and Inferences: Science is based on both observations and inferences Both observations and inferences are guided by scientists' prior knowledge and perspectives of current science; (3) Subjectivity and Objectivity in Science: Science aims to be objective and precise, but subjectivity in science is unavoidable; (4) Creativity and Rationality in Science: Scientific knowledge is created from human imagination and logical reasoning. This creation is based on observations and inferences of the natural world; (5) Social and Cultural Embeddedness in Science: Science is part of social and cultural traditions. Science is influenced by the society and culture in which it is practiced; FISER’14 | 15

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.