Revisiting restricted path consistency

Abstract

Restricted path consistency (RPC) is a strong local consistency for binary constraints that was proposed 20 years ago and was identified as a promising alternative to arc consistency (AC) in an early experimental study of local consistencies for binary constraints. However, in contrast to other strong local consistencies such as singleton arc consistency (SAC) and max restricted path consistency (maxRPC), it has been neglected since then. In this paper we revisit RPC. First we propose RPC3, a new RPC algorithm that is very easy to implement and can be efficiently applied throughout search. Then we perform a wide experimental study of RPC3 and a light version that achieves an approximation of RPC, comparing them to state-of-the-art AC and maxRPC algorithms. Experimental results obtained under various solver settings, regarding the branching scheme, the variable ordering heuristic, and restarts, clearly show that light RPC is by far more efficient than both AC and maxRPC when applied throughout search. We also examine the experimental behaviour of an algorithm for a simple extension of RCP called 2-RPC, showing that it is competitive with RPC3, and better than both AC and maxRPC. Overall, our results strongly suggest that it is time to reconsider the established perception that MAC is the best general purpose method for solving binary CSPs.