Abstract
During the earlier stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous studies used bicycle count data to understand the pandemic’s impact on urban cycling. However, given the context and timeliness of such studies, correcting for periods of missing data and ensuring data accuracy were not always possible. In this paper, we examine the quality of bicycle count data, using Montreal as a case study, and propose methodological improvements. By employing a missing value imputation technique and excluding sensors potentially affected by exogenous factors, we hope to provide cities with a more precise assessment of cycling trends.
Full Text
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call