Abstract

Eusociality is broadly defined as: colonies consisting of overlapping generations, cooperative brood care, and a reproductive division of labor where sterile (or non-reproductive) workers help the reproductive members. Colonies of many complex eusocial insect species (e.g., ants, bees, termites) exhibit traits, at the collective level, that are more analogous to biological individuals rather than to groups. Indeed, due to this, colonies of the most complex species are typically a unit of selection, which has led many authors to once again apply the concept of the superorganism to eusocial insects. However, unlike Wheeler, who originally employed the concept from a physiological and evolutionary perspective, today the superorganism is typically understood only from an evolutionary perspective, using group selection. This is because of the widely held view that eusocial colonies are self-organized systems. According to this view, even the most complex eusocial systems can be explained by appealing to a set of local interactions between parts of an initially disordered system (i.e., self-organization), without the need of any hierarchical control. In this paper, we challenge the mainstream view that hierarchical control and regulation does not occur, or is not necessary, in complex eusocial colonies. Using a case study of honey bees (Apis mellifera), we develop an alternative to the self-organization approach that focuses on the hierarchical nature of the organization of complex eusocial systems—that we refer to as the hierarchical-organizational approach. In addition, we analyze how colonies of eusocial insects show a complex set of interactions between the different organisms that bring forth a new cohesive collective organization, and how in turn the constitutive entities of this collective organization are transformed in this process. This paper argues that an inter-identity (namely the superorganism) emerges at the collective level in complex eusocial colonies, such as honey bees, due to the hierarchically organized network of interactions within the colony.

Highlights

  • Eusociality has been at the center of many debates in philosophy and biology for decades because it represents an extremely high form of social integration

  • The fact that eusocial systems show a high degree of integration raises debates about whether eusocial colonies can be considered as biological individuals in their own right rather than just groups

  • We develop an alternative organizational approach that assesses if there is hierarchical organization within complex colonies, which “modulates” the self-organized dynamics within the colony system; i.e., this approach will be able to assess if colony organization is the result of self-organization only or and mainly due to hierarchical regulation and control

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Eusociality has been at the center of many debates in philosophy and biology for decades because it represents an extremely high form of social integration. We will argue that in at least some complex eusocial insect species, like A. mellifera and possibly more, colonies exhibit a form of hierarchical organization, which exerts a top-down control on the development of its members.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call