Abstract
Review 2 of "Policing Perspectives Concerning Confusion and Uncertainty in Policing Practices with 'Honour'-Based Crimes and Forced Marriages"
Highlights
[For votes to count, referees must reasonably explain why they voted as they did
P.3 - Consider whether research question 2 and 3 should be swapped in order
P.11 –I fully concur with your comments about the ‘honour’ discourse being problematic, divisive and consonant with political agenda around race, immigration, Othering etc
Summary
[For votes to count, referees must reasonably explain why they voted as they did. please explain your vote. [For votes to count, referees must reasonably explain why they voted as they did. If you voted to publish pending minor changes, specify each change, why it is needed, and, possibly, how it should/could be done.] P.3 - Consider whether research question 2 and 3 should be swapped in order.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call