Abstract

A new moduli set $\{2^{2n}-1, 2^{n}, 2^{2n}+1\}$ derived from a recently proposed four moduli set $\{2^{n}-1, 2^{n}, 2^{n}+1, 2^{2n}+1\}$ is considered, in this paper. The problem of reverse conversion has been considered, and it is shown that the proposed moduli set needs less reverse conversion time and area requirements than the converter for the four moduli set $\{2^{n}-1, 2^{n}, 2^{n}+1, 2^{2n}+1\}$ from which it is derived. The proposed moduli set is also compared with two other well-known three moduli sets $\{2^{k}-1, 2^{k}, 2^{k}+1\}$ and $\{2^{\alpha }-1, 2^{\alpha }, 2^{\alpha - 1}-1\}$ for realizing the same dynamic range regarding the area and conversion times of the residue number system (RNS)-to-binary converters.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.