Abstract

The quantitative evaluation of the three-dimensional roughness feature of natural rock fracture surface is essential for predicting shear strength. This article presents an effective approach to estimate the three-dimensional roughness of natural fracture surfaces from the two-dimensional roughness of fracture profile. Firstly, four types of rough fracture samples were created using rock-like materials, followed by conducting direct shear tests of the fracture surfaces under 4 different normal pressures and 4 shear directions. The results of the shear strength tests exhibited a distinct discrete pattern and consistently increased with higher normal pressures. Furthermore, the distribution of the damage area on the fracture surface after shear was significantly impacted by the distribution and size of asperities, as well as the shear direction. The three-dimensional roughness of four fracture surfaces in different directions was first reverse calculated using the shear strength model. Using the weighted positive angle, the estimation of the three-dimensional roughness in different directions of the fracture surface was then determined from the two-dimensional roughness of fracture profiles using both the arithmetic mean method and the weighted average method. The weighted average method effectively captures the contribution of the two-dimensional roughness of fracture profiles to the three-dimensional roughness of fracture surfaces, and exhibits a lower estimation error compared to the arithmetic mean method. Compared to other roughness indicators, the three-dimensional roughness evaluated through the weighted positive angle indicator are closest to the experimental result. Finally, the influence of transverse spacing on the estimated three-dimensional roughness was discussed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call