Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare diagnostic accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (original set) and original MRI combined with the arterial phase of low-tube-voltage computed tomography (CT) (hybrid set). MethodsIn hybrid set, we substituted the CT arterial phase for MRI arterial phase. Three observers independently interpreted. The accuracy of each image set was evaluated using the alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic method. ResultsThe mean Az values for original set (0.96±0.01) was higher than that for hybrid set (0.94±0.01), but the difference was not significant (P=.10). ConclusionsIn cases with degradation of magnetic resonance arterial phase, reuse of CT arterial phase might be helpful instead of repeating MRI.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call