Abstract

The value of gadoxetic acid in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), based on perfusion criteria, is under dispute. This post-hoc analysis of the prospective, phase II, randomized, controlled SORAMIC study compared the accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (arterial, portovenous, and venous phase only) versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for stratifying patients with HCC to curative ablation or palliative treatment. Two reader groups (radiologists, R1 and R2) performed blind reads of CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (contrast dynamics only). A truth panel, with access to clinical and imaging follow-up data, served as reference. Primary endpoint was non-inferiority (margin: 5% points) of MRI vs. CT (lower 95% confidence interval [CI] > 0.75) in a first step and superiority (complete 95% CI > 1) in a second step. The intent-to-treat population comprised 538 patients. Accuracy of treatment decisions was 73.4% and 70.8% for CT (R1 and R2, respectively) and 75.1% and 70.3% for gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MRI. Non-inferiority but not superiority of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MRI versus CT was demonstrated (odds ratio 1.01; CI 0.97–1.05). Despite a theoretical disadvantage in wash-out depiction, gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MRI is non-inferior to CT in accuracy of treatment decisions for curative ablation versus palliative strategies. This outcome was not subject to the use of additional MR standard sequences.

Highlights

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents approximately 80–90% of all liver cancers [1]

  • Interreader agreement between the reader groups was moderate for computed tomography (CT) (Cohen’s kappa: 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51–0.66], reader group 1 (R1) vs. reader group 2 (R2), ITT) and substantial for dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (0.67 [95% CI 0.61–0.74])

  • Results for the PP population were comparable between dynamic MRI and CT at 0.73 and 0.61, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents approximately 80–90% of all liver cancers [1]. The theoretical rationale for excluding HBI criteria in Western guidelines is that uptake of gadoxetic acid early in the venous phase (resulting in a so-called transitional phase), in the surrounding liver parenchyma, may lead to a wash-out characterization of lesions besides perfusion-related factors only and, decrease specificity [4,5]. This technical consideration has not been reproduced, so far, in a prospective trial incorporating a clinically meaningful study endpoint, such as treatment decision-making

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call