Retrospective analysis of HER2-low in young breast cancer patients.

Abstract

e12515 Background: Traditionally, breast cancer (BC) is considered human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positive based on HER2 overexpression or amplification (HER2 3+ or ISH positive HER2 2+). However, an emerging subgroup of HER2 negative (HER2 1+ or 2+ and ISH negative) known as HER2-Low is associated with poor prognosis than HER2-normal (HER2 0). Currently, there is an increased interest in developing new drugs targeting HER2-Low BC to improve survival. The fact that BC in young constitutes a significant minority outside the western world but is underrepresented in clinical trials, it is worth conducting a dedicated study of HER2-low in this population to determine whether it affects their outcome. Methods: Confirmed HER2 negative BC patients aged ≤40 diagnosed in 2012-2017 were retrospectively reviewed in two centers in Alexandria, Egypt. Patients were classified as HER2-low (1+, 2+) and HER2-normal. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcome were determined and compared. Results: There were five hundred HER2 negative BC patients; 82% were hormone receptor-positive (HR+) vs.18% triple-negative (TNBC). Among the HER2 negative, only 31% were HER2-Low (n = 155), of which 20% was HER2-Low 1+ while 11% was HER2-Low 2+. In comparison, HER2-Low was significantly more HR+ than HER2-normal (89% vs. 79% respectively, p = 0.009). Other tumor characteristics (T-size, nodal status, Ki-67, lymphovascular invasion - LVI, extracapsular extension - ECE) were similar in HER2-Low and HER2-normal. So were the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Nevertheless, sub-grouping HER2-Low into 1+ and 2+ showed significant differences in tumor characteristics between HER2-normal, HER2-Low 1+, and HER2-Low 2+, in nodal status, tumor stage, ECE, and HR status. Moreover, DFS was significantly lower in HER2-Low 2+ (63.5%) compared to HER2-normal (70%) and HER2-Low 1+ (75%); p = 0.039. Also, the OS was also significantly lower in HER2-Low 2+ compared to HER2-normal, 90% vs 96% respectively, p = 0.023. Conclusions: Our results suggest no significant difference in DFS and OS between HER2-Low and HER2-normal in young BC patients. However, subdividing HER-low into HER2-low 1+ and HER2-Low 2+ better discriminates this group; HER2-Low 2+ had significantly poor DFS and OS and this should be considered in the clinical trials.