Abstract

Introduction stating the aim of the study: Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) is gaining acceptance among pediatric urologists. Few studies have evaluated the retroperitoneal approach for RALP. We share our experience from the first 2 years of a multidisciplinary pediatric robotic program in our center.Patients (or Materials) and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of children undergoing RALP for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (n = 50). Diagnosis was confirmed by ultrasound and Tc-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scan or MRI; the same criteria were used to evaluate outcome. Surgical approach was chosen according to a specific algorithm. Transperitoneal approach (n = 13) was reserved for horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidney, and redo surgery. We analyzed the 37 cases performed by a lateral retroperitoneal approach. Dismembered pyeloplasty was done for all cases and anastomosis was performed using a running monofilament 6/0 absorbable suture. All were drained by double J stent. Patient data, operating room parameters and postoperative course were recorded.Results: The median age was 7.9 years (5.1–13.8); the youngest was 2 years old. The median weight was 23 kg (17–41) with the smallest weighing 12.4 kg. Aberrant crossing vessels were present in 18 children. Median set-up time, from skin incision until the end of the 4-port insertion, was 33 min (29–48). Median surgeon's console time was 151 min (136–182). No conversion to an open procedure was necessary. The postoperative course was free of complications, except urinary tract infection in 6 children. All but 4 patients were discharged on day one. Median follow-up was 9 months (5–13). Redo pyeloplasty was not required. Practical training of other colleagues was possible after 10 cases performed by the same surgeon.Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that retroperitoneal RALP in children is feasible, safe and effective. It is an excellent option with ideal anatomical exposure. Longer term results as well as continued practice will identify and overcome any challenges and enable surgical mastery of this procedure which is still evolving.

Highlights

  • The European Association of Urology Pediatric guidelines acknowledge for pyeloplasty procedure that “in good and experienced hands, the open, laparoscopic, or robotic approaches have the same good outcome” [1]

  • A large single-center series with long-term follow-up addressed the impact of 10-year retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty experience in a pediatric teaching center, demonstrating that it is a safe, reliable, and efficient procedure with an excellent outcome [5]

  • Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty, as described by Yeung et al has been the standard treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) at our institution since 2010 and remained the approach of choice when we started the multidisciplinary pediatric robotic program in our center [6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The European Association of Urology Pediatric guidelines acknowledge for pyeloplasty procedure that “in good and experienced hands, the open, laparoscopic, or robotic approaches have the same good outcome” [1]. This statement is not based on level 1 evidence and pertains only to pyeloplasty. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty, as described by Yeung et al has been the standard treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) at our institution since 2010 and remained the approach of choice when we started the multidisciplinary pediatric robotic program in our center [6]. Publications evaluating the retroperitoneal approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty are limited [7, 8]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call