Abstract
In the energy-saving retrofit of existing buildings, investors are particularly concerned about the energy-saving performance of exterior windows and the payback period of additional costs. This study evaluates representative cities in four different climate zones in China to simulate the energy consumption of large office buildings after replacing different glass windows and conducting energy-saving and economic feasibility assessments. The research method includes the following steps: First, a baseline model of large office buildings in four cities was established using AutoBPS and OpenStudio. Then, the baseline and retrofit models of replacing glass windows were simulated using the EnergyPlus V9.3.0 to obtain multiple hourly energy consumption results. The commercial electricity and gas prices in the four cities were adjusted to calculate the total cost within 20 years after replacing different types of windows. Using the discounted payback period (DPP), net present value (NPV), and profitability index (PI) as evaluation indicators, a feasibility analysis was conducted in the four regions to evaluate the economic feasibility of replacing building windows. The simulation results show that considering economic feasibility and meeting energy-saving standards, it is more economical to choose windows with moderate U-value and SHGC value in the four regions than to choose windows with the smallest U-value and SHGC value, and that both energy savings and economic benefits are closely related to building age, with older buildings (especially those in Changsha and Shenzhen) showing greater benefits. Furthermore, the optimal window types in the four cities determined in this study can recover the investment cost within the window life, with Harbin (SC), Beijing (C), Changsha (HC), and Shenzhen (HW) with the payback period of 6.60, 15.66, 10.16, and 11.42 years, respectively. The research model established in this study provides a useful evaluation path for selecting windows for the energy-saving retrofit of large office buildings in cities in different climate zones and provides data support for the decision making of energy-saving retrofit investors.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.