Abstract

Secondary forests (SF) are important carbon sinks, removing CO2 from the atmosphere through the photosynthesis process and storing photosynthates in their aboveground live biomass (AGB). This process occurring at large-scales partially counteracts C emissions from land-use change, playing, hence, an important role in the global carbon cycle. The absorption rates of carbon in these forests depend on forest physiology, controlled by environmental and climatic conditions, as well as on the past land use, which is rarely considered for retrieving AGB from remotely sensed data. In this context, the main goal of this study is to evaluate the potential of polarimetric (quad-pol) ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 data for estimating AGB in a SF area. Land-use was assessed through Landsat time-series to extract the SF age, period of active land-use (PALU), and frequency of clear cuts (FC) to randomly select the SF plots. A chronosequence of 42 SF plots ranging 3–28 years (20 ha) near the Tapajós National Forest in Pará state was surveyed to quantifying AGB growth. The quad-pol data was explored by testing two regression methods, including non-linear (NL) and multiple linear regression models (MLR). We also evaluated the influence of the past land-use in the retrieving AGB through correlation analysis. The results showed that the biophysical variables were positively correlated with the volumetric scattering, meaning that SF areas presented greater volumetric scattering contribution with increasing forest age. Mean diameter, mean tree height, basal area, species density, and AGB were significant and had the highest Pearson coefficients with the Cloude decomposition (λ3), which in turn, refers to the volumetric contribution backscattering from cross-polarization (HV) (ρ = 0.57–0.66, p-value < 0.001). On the other hand, the historical use (PALU and FC) showed the highest correlation with angular decompositions, being the Touzi target phase angle the highest correlation (Φs) (ρ = 0.37 and ρ = 0.38, respectively). The combination of multiple prediction variables with MLR improved the AGB estimation by 70% comparing to the NL model (R2 adj. = 0.51; RMSE = 38.7 Mg ha−1) bias = 2.1 ± 37.9 Mg ha−1 by incorporate the angular decompositions, related to historical use, and the contribution volumetric scattering, related to forest structure, in the model. The MLR uses six variables, whose selected polarimetric attributes were strongly related with different structural parameters such as the mean forest diameter, basal area, and the mean forest tree height, and not with the AGB as was expected. The uncertainty was estimated to be 18.6% considered all methodological steps of the MLR model. This approach helped us to better understand the relationship between parameters derived from SAR data and the forest structure and its relation to the growth of the secondary forest after deforestation events.

Highlights

  • Secondary forests (SFs) are defined as areas of forests where clear cut was made only by anthropic actions, whether or not for conversion to other land uses, according to the Convention on BiologicalDiversity (CDB) [1]

  • Despite the multiple definitions of SFs found in the literature [2,3,4,5], hereafter, we consider as SFs areas that are in a process of regeneration after complete removal of primary forests (PFs) through clear cut or areas with characteristics in conformity with the definition proposed by the CDB [1]

  • According to Forest Resources Assessment FRA/FAO [7], from 106 nations located in the tropics, 36 have all remaining forests composed of SFs, almost half of all tropical countries have the majority of their forest land dominated by SFs, and only 19 of them have the dominance of PF in their territory, including Brazil

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Secondary forests (SFs) are defined as areas of forests where clear cut was made only by anthropic actions, whether or not for conversion to other land uses, according to the Convention on BiologicalDiversity (CDB) [1]. Despite the multiple definitions of SFs found in the literature [2,3,4,5], hereafter, we consider as SFs areas that are in a process of regeneration after complete removal of primary forests (PFs) through clear cut or areas with characteristics in conformity with the definition proposed by the CDB [1]. This definition was chosen because it adequately encompasses the classes of SF discriminated by satellite data on a regional or global scale [6]. Optical background image is Landsat 5 TM Path/Row 227/69 of 29 June 2010, RGB/short‐infrared (band 5), background image is Landsat

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call