Abstract

Introduction and MethodsA large number of behavioral studies show that retrieval practice is a powerful way of strengthening learning of new information. Repeated retrieval might support long‐term retention in a quantitative sense by inducing stronger episodic representations or in a qualitative sense by contributing to the formation of more gist‐like representations. Here we used fMRI to examine the brain bases related to the learning effects following retrieval practice and provide imaging support for both views by showing increased activation of anterior and posterior hippocampus regions during a delayed memory test.ResultsBrain activity in the posterior hippocampus increased linearly as a function of number of successful retrievals during initial learning, whereas anterior hippocampus activity was restricted to items retrieved many but not few times during the learning phase.ConclusionTaken together, these findings indicate that retrieval practice strengthens subsequent retention via “dual action” in the anterior and posterior hippocampus, possibly reflecting coding of individual experiences as well as integration and generalization across multiple experiences. Our findings are of educational significance by providing insight into the brain bases of a learning method of applied relevance.

Highlights

  • | INTRODUCTIONTesting yourself while learning new information (i.e., retrieval practice) improves retention of the to-be-learned material more than typical repetition or restudy (Roediger & Butler, 2011; Roediger & Karpicke, 2006a, 2006b; Rowland, 2014)

  • Introduction and MethodsA large number of behavioral studies show that retrieval practice is a powerful way of strengthening learning of new information

  • Motivated by behavioral studies emphasizing that a factor underlying the testing effect is the number of successful repeated retrievals during learning (e.g., Jang et al, 2012; Rawson & Dunlosky, 2011; Roediger & Butler, 2011; Rowland, 2014), we predicted that HC activity would scale with the number of successful retrievals during learning at day one

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Testing yourself while learning new information (i.e., retrieval practice) improves retention of the to-be-learned material more than typical repetition or restudy (Roediger & Butler, 2011; Roediger & Karpicke, 2006a, 2006b; Rowland, 2014). Motivated by behavioral studies emphasizing that a factor underlying the testing effect is the number of successful repeated retrievals during learning (e.g., Jang et al, 2012; Rawson & Dunlosky, 2011; Roediger & Butler, 2011; Rowland, 2014), we predicted that HC activity would scale with the number of successful retrievals during learning at day one (i.e., the initial learning session). For both analyses, potential differences along the HC axis were assessed. If pHC activity reflects detailed representations that are strengthened by testing during the initial phase, pHC activity might be a general signature of the TE that, in contrast to aHC, is more gradually strengthened by the number of successful retrievals during the learning session

| Participants
| DISCUSSION
Findings
| CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call