Abstract
Retracted: Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion
Highlights
At the request of the authors, International Scholarly Research Notices has retracted the article titled “Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion” [ ]. ere were several mistakes on the sample selection and group categorization. e authors divided the patients into Group I (N= ) and Group (N= ), but this group categorization did not consider “Angle Classification”, which is a critical factor in orthodontics. e authors measured only the upper arch
Skeletal and dental condition: Class I or Class II molar relationship, normal overbite (>, < ), labioversed upper incisor (U to palatal plane> ∘), and less than mm crowding in each arch
Summary
At the request of the authors, International Scholarly Research Notices has retracted the article titled “Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion” [ ]. Ere were several mistakes on the sample selection and group categorization.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
