Abstract
Chinese patenting abroad has risen impressively in recent years, and analyses have pointed to these numbers to conclude that Chinese patent quality and value, and China's overall innovation trajectory, are more positive than conventional wisdom indicates. This article critically assesses these conclusions.The article posits that although international patenting data have often been used as indicators of the quality and value of firms'/other entities' patents, and countries' overall innovation trajectories, there are several overlooked reasons why such data are not as representative of these components in China as recent analyses suggest. The assessment — which draws on a literature review, statistical analysis and consultations with Chinese firms — shows that without careful consideration of China-specific ‘institutional and scale’ as well as ‘rational-firm’ considerations, conclusions drawn from international patenting statistics about Chinese entities' patent quality and value are misleading. This understanding provides a more tempered and objective outlook on China's innovation trajectory and concludes that several different approaches, which do not utilize only certain single metrics based on international filing or grant data (including for triadic patent families or Patent Cooperation Treaty filings or other metrics), are needed in order to make robust assessments of Chinese entities' patent quality and value.This article provides practical insights about how to interpret more accurately the rise in Chinese entities' international patenting filings. The analytical considerations and approach developed can be used by businesses to improve strategic planning and advice-giving, and academics and government analysts to more accurately conduct research and draw policy conclusions related to China's innovation outlook.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call