Abstract

Originally focused on seeking policy solutions through international cooperation, transnational administration, and global governance, the study of global environmental policy has become increasingly diverse and fragmented. Complex, crosscutting variables ranging from a wider constellation of non‐state actors to diverse critical perspectives, along with a focus on narrower sub‐fields and the changing nature of environmental challenges themselves, have left the field in a state of flux. A broader, more process‐oriented explanatory framework is needed. Institutionalist, global governance and civil society approaches, as well as middle‐range concepts such as policy networks, are insufficient, while critical analyses, although a step in the right direction, are overly deterministic. Transnational neopluralism, which focuses on struggles for power and influence among material interest groups, social movements, and political actors in diverse issue‐areas, provides a more robust framework for developing a more insightful research agenda and more constructive policy‐making strategies in an increasingly complex and interdependent world.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.