Results of venous resections in cancer of the pancreatic head.

Abstract

e16785 Background: Studies have shown that pancreaticoduodenal resection (PDR) with resection and reconstruction of the venous segment does not interfere with surgical treatment for ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma with suspected venous invasion. Venous resection improves survival compared to palliative interventions. However, the advantages and disadvantages of marginal resection, segmental resection with direct anastomosis, and venous segment prosthetics are not reflected. Methods: The study included 52 patients (23 women, 29 men) undergoing PDR with venous resection and reconstruction for cancer of the pancreatic head in 2015-2019. The average tumor size was 3.8 cm. Results: Superior mesenteric vein reconstruction (PTFE grafts) was performed in 17 patients (32.7%), sleeve resection with direct anastomosis - 24 (46.2%), marginal resection - 11 (21.1%). Venous reconstruction was planned in 78.8% of patients before the surgery. In the early postoperative period, thrombosis of the reconstructed zone was developed in two patients (3.8%), bleeding from the pancreatic bed - in one case (1.9%). Postoperative mortality was 5.8% (3 patients). After the final pathological examination, macroscopically incomplete resection was diagnosed only in the group with marginal resection and amounted to 3.8%. Microscopically incomplete resection was diagnosed in 9.6% of the studied preparations (in marginal resection of the vein wall - 3.8%, with direct anastomosis - 1.9%, SMV prosthetics - 3.8%). Most often, R1 resection was detected in the retroperitoneal resection margin (80%). The lowest 1-year survival was observed in the group with marginal resection (36.4%). No significant differences in survival rates were found in patients with direct venous anastomosis (62.5%) and venous prosthetics (64.7%) (RR 1.69; 95% CI 0.69-4.12, p > 0.05). Microscopically complete resection R0 improved the survival (RR 2.7; 95% CI 1.45-5.04, p < 0.05). Planning the venous resection was an additional risk factor affecting the completeness of resection (RR 4.6; CI 95% 1.5-14.5, p > 0.05). Conclusions: Expanding the surgery volume in PDR due to venous resection and reconstruction shows acceptable rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Planning the venous resection enhances the results of radical surgery.