Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate clinical and functional results of implantation of a new hydrophobic acrylic monofocal IOL in a preloaded injector.Methods. The prospective study included 60 patients (66 eyes) after Hoya iSert® 250/251 IOL implantation (31 patients, 35 eyes, group 1) and a new Hoya Vivinex Multisert® XY1-SP IOL (29 patients, 31 eyes, group 2). The mean age was 75.1 ± 7.9 years. The mean follow-up period after surgery was 3.1 ± 0.4 months. IOL viscoimplantation was performed in 100 % of cases in group 1, in group 2 — in 45.1 % of cases, and in 54.9 % — hydroimplantation was performed. Intraoperatively, the size of the corneal incision was measured with a ruler before and after IOL implantation. IOL optic power was calculated with SRK/T and Barrett Universal formulas. In the postoperative period, surgically induced astigmatism was assessed.Results. In both groups, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase of UCDVA from 0.28 ± 0.09 in the preoperative period to 0.70 ± 0.17 3 months after surgery in group 1 and from 0.24 ± 0.10 in the preoperative period to 0.84 ± 0.18 3 months after surgery in group 2. Slightly lower values of UCDVA in group 1 may be associated with a higher level of SIA in this group. Similar dynamics were shown for the BCDVA (from 0.52 ± 0.21 before surgery to 0.95 ± 0.19 after 3 months of follow-up in group 1 and from 0.55 ± 0.20 before surgery to 0.98 ± 0.21 after 3 months of follow-up in group 2). No differences were found between the studied groups. After IOL implantation, there was an increase in incision size to 2.40 ± 0.12 mm in group 1 and 2.10 ± 0.08 mm in group 2 (p = 0.04). In group 1, the mean SIA after 3 months of observation was 1.10 ± 0.16 D and in group 2, 0.48 ± 0.07 D (p = 0.0007).Conclusion. This study presents the first domestic experience with the implantation of a new monofocal hydrophobic acrylic Hoya Vivinex IOL in a Multisert® preloaded injector. A comparative analysis of implantation results with monofocal Hoya 250/251 IOLs in an Isert® injector was performed. The advantage of the new IOL implantation in reducing the incidence of surgically induced astigmatism was shown.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.