Abstract
Encountering the articulation of the strongness of local authorities and market forces in China’s development, attention has been paid to the changing central state which recentralised the regulation capability of localities which has more discretional power on resources utilisation, land for example, in the post-reform era. Yet it is still not clear-cut what drives the state rescaling in terms of land governance and by what ways. After dissecting the evolving policies and practices of construction land supply in China with the focus on the roles of state, we draw two main conclusions. First, the policy trajectory of construction land supply entails a complicated reconfiguration of state functions, which is driven by three interwoven relations: land–capital relation, peasant–state relation and rural–urban relation. Second, state rescaling in terms of the governance of construction land provision works via four important approaches: limited decentralism, horizontal integralism, local experimentalism and political mobilisationism. By reviewing the institutional arrangements of construction land provision and the state rescaling process behind them, this article offers a nuanced perspective to the state (re)building that goes beyond the simplified (vertical or horizontal) transition of state functions.
Highlights
Land-use policy, especially institutional arrangements relating to construction land supply, is a critical tool to harness regional development
We argue that the transition of construction landuse policies provides a scaffold for us to see the state rearticulating its irreversibility in land governance
This paper examines the policy transition of construction land supply and the state rescaling strategies
Summary
Land-use policy, especially institutional arrangements relating to construction land supply, is a critical tool to harness regional development. We need to understand why and how the transitions of the land-use policies and state reconfiguration connect in a more systematic manner, which entails us to understand the urban and rural transformation in China better. To this end, this paper traces the subtle state restructure process to harness land governance via construction land supply policies, with a focus on the post time of the reform and opening-up since 1978. We argue that the transition of construction landuse policies provides a scaffold for us to see the state rearticulating its irreversibility in land governance. After an overview of theoretical debates on state rescaling followed by a discussion on Chinese state reassembling, this paper reviews the main policy transition in terms of construction land supply and tries to interrogate the state reordering behind the policy transition before drawing some concluding remarks
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have