Restrictive vs liberal blood transfusion strategy for patients with burn trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

British Journal of Hospital MedicineVol. 84, No. 5 PosterRestrictive vs liberal blood transfusion strategy for patients with burn trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysisValerie J Dirjayanto, Jasmine V Anjani, Tazkiya P Ariviani, Febriyan N Satria, Raisa ZM Abubakar, Cut A Rhania, Muhammad A ArsyafValerie J DirjayantoCorrespondence to: Valerie J Dirjayanto; E-mail Address: [email protected]Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UKFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaSearch for more papers by this author, Jasmine V AnjaniFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UKFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaSearch for more papers by this author, Tazkiya P ArivianiFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UKFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaSearch for more papers by this author, Febriyan N SatriaFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UKFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaSearch for more papers by this author, Raisa ZM AbubakarFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UKFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaSearch for more papers by this author, Cut A RhaniaFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UKFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaSearch for more papers by this author, Muhammad A ArsyafFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UKFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaSearch for more papers by this authorValerie J Dirjayanto; Jasmine V Anjani; Tazkiya P Ariviani; Febriyan N Satria; Raisa ZM Abubakar; Cut A Rhania; Muhammad A ArsyafPublished Online:4 May 2023https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2023.0144AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References Docherty AB, O’Donnell R, Brunskill S et al. Effect of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies on outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease in a non-cardiac surgery setting: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;352:i1351. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1351 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarGomez M, Cartotto R, Knighton J, Smith K, Fish JS. Improved survival following thermal injury in adult patients treated at a regional burn center. J Burn Care Res. 2008;29(1):130-137 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarHiggins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557-60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarJeschke MG, Chinkes DL, Finnerty CC, Przkora R, Pereira CT, Herndon DN. Blood transfusions are associated with increased risk for development of sepsis in severely burned pediatric patients. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(2):579583. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000253812.09236.98 Crossref, Google ScholarKwan P, Gomez M, Cartotto R. Safe and successful restriction of transfusion in burn patients. J Burn Care Res. 2006;27(6):826-834. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BCR.0000245494.45125.3E Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarMoher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pmed.1000097 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarPalmieri TL, Holmes JH 4th, Arnoldo B et al. Transfusion Requirement in Burn Care Evaluation (TRIBE): a multicenter randomized prospective trial of blood transfusion in major burn injury. Ann Surg. 2017;266(4):595-602. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002408 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarPalmieri TL, Holmes JH, Arnoldo B et al. Restrictive transfusion strategy is more effective in massive burns: results of the TRIBE multicenter prospective randomized trial. Mil Med. 2019;184(Suppl 1):11-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usy279 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarRiley RD, Moons KGM, Snell KIE et al. A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies. BMJ. 2019;364:k4597. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4597 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarSalehi SH, Daniali M, Motaghi P, Momeni M. The best strategy for red blood cell transfusion in severe burn patients, restrictive or liberal: A randomized controlled trial. Burns. 2021;47(5):1038-1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2020.06.038 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarSterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarViswanathan M, Ansari MT, Berkman ND et al. Assessing the risk of bias of individual studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions. 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK91433/ (accessed 18 April 2023) Google ScholarWells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2000. https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed 18 April 2023) Google ScholarZhang Y, Xu Z, Huang Y et al. Restrictive vs. Liberal red blood cell transfusion strategy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:736163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.736163 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails 2 May 2023Volume 84Issue 5ISSN (print): 1750-8460ISSN (online): 1759-7390 Metrics History Published online 4 May 2023 Published in print 2 May 2023 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download