Abstract
Sentiment analysis is now widely used in the creation of recommender systems in a variety of areas, as well as the restaurant and food service industries. Most restaurant recommender systems based on sentiment analysis, on the other hand, depend only on static data such food quality, cost, and service quality. Personalised suggestions are generated by analysing user views and extracting their dietary preferences, which is a study need in the literature. A context-aware recommender system is suggested in this study, which extracts people's food preferences from their comments and proposes restaurants based on those choices. Finally, adjacent open eateries are suggested depending on how well they match the user's choices. The Kaggle platform was utilised for review, and feedback from various users was gathered. The system's In three scenarios, accuracy, recall, and f-measure are evaluated for the Wu-palmer module: top1, top3, and top5. The same dataset was used to measure the cosine similarity and the Jaccard similarity, and their accuracy and precision were calculated, and these three modules were compared. The findings show that the suggested systems can deliver suggestions with 92.8 percent (Wu-Palmer) accuracy, 87 percent for cosine similarity, and 82 percent for Jaccard similarity. Giving users a high level of precision, Wu-Palmer has the greatest accuracy compared to the other two Cosine and Jaccard Similarity algorithms. Furthermore, in these areas the system exceeds past studies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.