Abstract
The study explores the mechanism by which unadapted causal attributions and the perception of social support stimulate revenge and reconciliation at the social and professional level in the context of the current pandemic. In particular, the purpose of the study is to investigate the relationship between the accused, the victim and offender status and the search for revenge or reconciliation following a personal offense. To test the suggested research model, we analyzed the data collected by 167 (m = 28.52; SD = 8.98) employees in different organizations using a multifactorial experimental design. The results support the influence of attributional predictions in forming revenge and reconciliation and show that they are involved in the decision to carry out revenge, but especially in the way the employee interprets the trigger situation. In conclusion, the revenge is based on a negative attributional mechanism that produces the greatest deficit of adaptation to the situation and a weakening of the perception of social support, while reconciliation seems to be based on a much more complex socio-occupational mechanism. Leaders should pay attention to organizational communication during a crisis as they could encourage hopelessness depression. Adjusting crisis communication is crucial to ensuring job satisfaction that could mitigate negative effects.
Highlights
We are living in times of great complexity to which there is currently no clear answer
We evaluated the assumptions of multivariate normality and linearity through statistical pack for social sciences (SPSS)
Our initial results based on confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated an adequate model fit of the tested models corresponding to the factor structure of Revenge and Reconciliation Scales
Summary
We are living in times of great complexity to which there is currently no clear answer. The various and often contradictory explanatory trends on the pandemic declared by the WHO (World Health Organization) in 2020–2021, in association with often irrational government decisions, but justified by lack of knowledge of reality and supported by organizations and institutions (including sponsored media), have generated various (often negative) reactions in the case of employers, but especially employees. Organizational theory in this pandemic context is subject to serious and relevant verification at least at the application level. Ramkissoon (2020, 2021b) and Huynh (2020b) indicated that understanding of the risk at Community level and adherence to the pro-health adaptive behavior promoted by public health institutions on COVID-19 may reduce the spread of the virus
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have