Responses of promyelocytic leukemia HL60 cells as an inflammatory cell lineage model to silica microparticles used to coat blood collection tubes

Abstract

BackgroundThe preparation of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) requires glass blood collection tubes, and thus, the shortage or unavailability of such tubes has driven clinicians to search for suitable substitutes, such as silica-coated plastic tubes. However, we have previously demonstrated the cytotoxicity of silica microparticles (MPs) used in plastic tubes to cultured human periosteal cells. To further establish the effects of silica MPs on inflammation, we examined silica MP-induced changes in a human promyelocytic cell model in vitro.MethodsHuman promyelocytic HL60 cells were used either without chemical induction or after differentiation induced using phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) or dimethyl sulfoxide. HL60 cells, osteoblastic MG63, and Balb/c mouse cells were treated with silica MPs, and their surface ultrastructure and numbers were examined using a scanning electron microscope and an automated cell counter, respectively. Differentiation markers, such as acid phosphatase, non-specific esterase, and CD11b, were visualized by cytochemical and immunofluorescent staining, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was quantified.ResultsRegardless of SOD activity, silica cytotoxicity was observed in MG63 and Balb/c cells. At sub-toxic doses, silica MPs slightly or moderately upregulated the differentiation markers of the control, PMA-induced monocytic, and dimethyl sulfoxide-induced granulocytic HL60 cells. Although SOD activity was the highest (P < 0.05) in PMA-induced cells, a silica-induced reduction in cell adhesion was observed only in those cells (P < 0.05).ConclusionsSilica MP contamination of PRF preparations can potentially exacerbate inflammation at implantation sites. Consequently, unless biomedical advantages can be identified, silica-coated plastic blood collection tubes should not be routinely used for PRF preparations.