Responses of otebo bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to postemergence herbicides

Abstract

Ontario otebo bean growers have few herbicide options available for weed management. Six field trials were conducted in Ontario, Canada, over a 2 year period (2003 and 2004) to evaluate the tolerance of otebo bean to the postemergence (POST) application of bentazon at 1080 and 2160 g ai ha−1, fomesafen at 240 and 480 g ai ha−1, sethoxydim at 500 and 1000 g ai ha−1, quizalofop‐p‐ethyl at 72 and 144 g ai ha−1, imazamox plus fomesafen at 25 + 200 and 50 + 400 g ai ha−1, and imazamox plus bentazon at 25 + 600 and 50 + 1200 g ai ha−1. All treatments, including the untreated control, were maintained weed‐free during the growing season. The POST application of bentazon, imazamox plus fomesafen, and imazamox plus bentazon caused as much as 9% visual injury and reduced the plant height ≤ 12%, reduced the shoot dry weight ≤ 32%, and delayed maturity but had no adverse effect on the yield of otebo bean. Fomesafen, sethoxydim, and quizalofop‐p‐ethyl applied POST caused as much as 8% visual injury but this was transient and had no adverse effect on the plant height, shoot dry weight, seed moisture content, and yield of otebo bean, except for quizalofop‐p‐ethyl, which reduced the shoot dry weight as much as 18%. Based on these results, bentazon, fomesafen, sethoxydim, quizalofop‐p‐ethyl, imazamox plus fomesafen, and imazamox plus bentazon applied POST have an adequate margin of crop safety for weed management in otebo bean production in Ontario. However, care must be taken to avoid spray overlaps to prevent injury from bentazon, imazamox plus fomesafen, and imazamox plus bentazon.