Abstract
I appreciate the letter from Foster, Chou, and Croft expressing their concerns about my recent article on health safety guidelines for RF exposures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">[1]</xref> . The letter is understandable, given its authors strong convictions that there is nothing but heat to worry about with RF exposure. In the interest of clarity, I will respond to the writers’ three points in their order of presentation.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have