Abstract
Dans le cadre d'un dossier de la revue «Social epistemology» (13, 3/4, 1999, pp. 241-302) consacre a l'etat de l'epistemologie sociale au Japon, l'A. repond aux reactions et critiques que lui ont adressees les scientifiques japonais a travers les contributions precedentes (Kobayashi, Hirikawa, Kanamori, Kihara). Se proposant de clarifier les presupposes normatifs de sa conception de l'epistemologie sociale, en general, et de sa conception de l'economie cognitive de la science, en particulier, l'A. revient sur la question ethique fondamentale de la gestion de la production et de la distribution de la connaissance, et du role de l'expert (peer review) dans l'activite scientifique
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
