Abstract
We believe that the comments by Henry Kahn and Dennis Santella (K&S) are flawed because they assume a use for the signature method that was never intended. Further, the K&S comments neglect to provide an adequate history of the process that led to the development of the WTC dust signature.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.