Abstract
In his Correspondence article ([p. 871][1]), DeForest Mellon, Jr argues that the type of seta in our report ([Monteclaro et al., 2010][2]) was erroneously identified. In response, we would like to make the following remarks. Stimulation of an antennule that was either seta-less or without plumose
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
