Abstract
Summary form only given. We would like to thank Professor Taur and his colleagues for pointing out that the variation of an additional factor, emission probability (e <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">n</sub> ), affects the charging current associated with border traps. While the new derivation shown in their comments is complete, we believe that the transconductance model of the above-named article [ibid., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 735-737, Jun. 2013] does not introduce significant numerical error when applied to interpret the C-V data (1 kHz-1 MHz) measured from the high-k/GaAs MOS systems discussed in the original article. The original authors present a model to show that in spite of the missing factor in transconductance model, the model does not introduce significant errors within the parameter range discussed in the original work so the conclusions about the GaAs MOS capacitors in the original article should still be considered valid.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.