Abstract
To examine the effectiveness and identify clinical response predictors of a short corticosteroid-based regimen consisting of topical preservative-free 0.1% dexamethasone (Monopex®, Théa Laboratories) in conjunction with artificial tears (AT) for dry eyes in a real-life clinical setting. Patients were recruited from the Norwegian Dry Eye Clinic and were allowed to use ATs of their own choice in addition to the prescribed 14-day topical dexamethasone course. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5), Schirmer test (ST), fluorescein tear film break-up time (FBUT), ocular surface staining (OSS), meibum expressibility (ME), meibum quality (MQ), number of expressible meibomian glands among the central eight glands in the lower lids (NMG) and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured at baseline and at 1-month follow-up. The average values of clinical parameters from both eyes were used for analyses. A paired t-test and a significance value of p < 0.05 were used for statistical analyses. Associations between sex, age, baseline values and the changes after the intervention (Δ) were explored using linear regression. A total of 167 patients (124 women, mean age 54 years ±17 (standard deviation)) were included. One month after initiation of intervention, OSDI and DEQ5 scores improved from 39.5 ± 22.1 to 31.4 ± 21.3 (p < 0.001) and from 12.6 ± 4.2 to 11.0 ± 4.6 (p < 0.001), respectively. OSS improved from 2.2 ± 1.4 to 1.8 ± 1.5 (p < 0.001), NMG increased from 4.8 ± 2.2 to 5.1 ± 2.2 (p < 0.05), while IOP decreased from 12.9 ± 3.3 to 12.4 ± 3.5 mmHg (p < 0.05). Significant associations were found between the change in symptoms and objective measures of DED (ΔOSDI, ΔDEQ5, ΔOSS, ΔFBUT, ΔNMG, ΔMQ) and their respective baseline values (OSDI, DEQ5, OSS, FBUT, NMG, MQ). The remaining tests did not show statistically significant changes. Improvement in dry eye symptoms and signs were observed following a short course of topical, preservative-free 0.1% dexamethasone treatment in combination with AT. Individuals exhibiting more pronounced symptoms and signs witnessed the most profound improvements with the treatment regimen, suggesting that poor baseline parameters may serve as response predictors of the treatment regimen. While the real-life data presented herein are valuable, the conclusions are limited by the inherent biases of a non-controlled study.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
