Abstract
[1] Response of low-latitude ionosphere to the geomagnetic storm of 24 August 2005 has been studied using total electron content (TEC) data obtained from the Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers. These studies were carried out using the receivers that were located (1) near the northern crest (∼15°N mag. Lat.) of the equatorial ionization anomaly around 56°E, 74°E, and 102°E longitude and (2) from the northern crest of the ionization anomaly down to the magnetic equator in the longitude belt 75°E ± 3°E. These studies have been substantiated with the ground-based magnetometer data at Tirunelveli and Alibag, an equatorial and off equatorial station, respectively. The ground-based ionosonde data at New Delhi, a low-latitude station, have also been used to substantiate the TEC observations. The storm day TEC shows two well-defined humps at all stations wherein enhancements of the order of 80%–100% have been observed. While the first of the enhancements has been attributed to the prompt penetration electric field associated with an interplanetary electric field (IEF Ey) of about 35 mV/m, the other one has been attributed to the second episode of the prompt penetration electric field (IEF Ey ∼ 20 mV/m) and abnormal equatorial plasma fountain in late evening hours, respectively. During the unsteady ring current conditions when the IMF Bz was still southward, penetration of a westward electric field has been inferred. Two peaks in foF2 have been observed whose time of occurrence coincides with those of the humps in the low-latitude TEC. Results from stations having nearly the same magnetic latitude show that the ionospheric response, in terms of GPS TEC, to the prompt penetration electric fields is longitudinally independent. Formation of the first hump in TEC is progressively delayed in time from low to near-equatorial latitudes for stations in different magnetic latitudes along nearly the same longitude. However, its time of appearance at Diego Garcia, a station magnetically conjugate to Udaipur, is the same as that at Udaipur. The results also reveal the poleward expansion of the ionization anomaly due to the storm. Disturbance dynamoelectric fields have been inferred to be responsible for the suppressed plasma fountain, resulting in suppressed TEC values and equatorward contraction of the ionization anomaly on 25 August, compared to a reference quiet day.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.