Abstract
Two basic assumptions made in personal probability testing procedures are reviewed. Some empirical examinee response data are examined and it is suggested that these assumptions should not be taken lightly in empirical studies of personal probability testing procedures.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
