Abstract

The circular economy is proposed to reduce environmental impact, but as yet, there is limited empirical evidence of this sort from studying real, commercial circular economy business cases. This study investigates the environmental impacts of using second-hand laptops, mediated by a commercial reuse operation, instead of new ones. The method used is life cycle assessment (LCA) and special attention is given to laptops’ metal resource use by using several complementary life cycle impact assessment methods. The results show that all activities required to enable reuse of laptops are negligible, despite the reuse company’s large geographical scope. Two principal features of reuse reduce environmental impacts. Firstly, use extension reduces all impacts considerably since there are large embedded impacts in components. Secondly, the reuse company steers non-reusable laptops into state-of-the-art recycling. This provides additional impact reductions, especially with regards to toxicity and metal resource use. The results for metal resource use however diverge between LCIA methods in terms of highlighted metals which, in turn, affects the degree of impact reduction. LCIA methods that characterise functionally recycled metals as important, result in larger impact reduction, since these emphasise the merits of steering flows into state-of-the-art recycling. The study thus demonstrates how using second-hand laptops, mediated by a commercial reuse operation, compared to new ones, in practice, reduces different types of environmental impact through synergistic relationships between reuse and recycling. Moreover, it illustrates how the choice of LCIA method can influence interpretations of metal resource use impacts when applying circular economy measures to information and communication technologies (ICT).

Highlights

  • Production of information and communication technology (ICT), such as laptop and desktop computers, tablets and smartphones, draws on energy and resource intensive manufacturing processes (Williams et al, 2002) as well as a broad spectrum of metal resources (Graedel et al, 2015; NRC, 2008) that may be considered scarce due to different types of constraints, e.g., economic (Tilton, 2010), social (Fitzpatrick et al, 2014) geochemical (Skinner, 1979) and geopolitical (EC, 2014; NRC, 2008)

  • The results for each impact category essentially depends on two key features: use extension which reduces the need for primary laptop production and steering of flows into recycling which reduces the need for primary metal production

  • Since preparation for reuse is mostly negligible, the contribution of use extension to the total impact reduction for any impact category depends on the reuse efficiency (70%) and the duration of use extension

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Production of information and communication technology (ICT), such as laptop and desktop computers, tablets and smartphones, draws on energy and resource intensive manufacturing processes (Williams et al, 2002) as well as a broad spectrum of metal resources (Graedel et al, 2015; NRC, 2008) that may be considered scarce due to different types of constraints, e.g., economic (Tilton, 2010), social (Fitzpatrick et al, 2014) geochemical (Skinner, 1979) and geopolitical (EC, 2014; NRC, 2008). CE can be described as a new framing around preexisting concepts that aim to extend the productive life of resources through measures such as long-life design, reuse, repair, remanufacturing and recycling (Blomsma and Brennan, 2017; Ghisellini et al, 2016). Such measures as a collective will be referred to as CE measures.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call